The King starring Timothée Chalamet - How the Battle Scene was Shot | Netflix
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024
- Timothée Chalamet stars as Henry V, real-life king of England, in Netflix's The King.
Joel Edgerton and director David Michod explain how the massive battle of Agincourt scene was filmed, shot by shot.
Watch The King, Only on Netflix: www.netflix.co...
SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/29qBUt7
About Netflix:
Netflix is the world's leading internet entertainment service with over 158 million paid memberships in over 190 countries enjoying TV series, documentaries and feature films across a wide variety of genres and languages. Members can watch as much as they want, anytime, anywhere, on any internet-connected screen. Members can play, pause and resume watching, all without commercials or commitments.
The King starring Timothée Chalamet - How the Battle Scene was Shot | Netflix
/ netflix
Wayward Prince Hal must turn from carouser to warrior king as he faces hostilities from inside and outside the castle walls in the battle for England.
Do more movies like these Netflix, you have the potential to be the king again. Stop putting crappy teen shows and crappy stand up comedies.
I agree. Movies like this is why I got Netflix in the first place.
Well said!👍
man i wish this was a series
tell me im pretty it would never be a series because king Henry V wasn’t a very accomplished king. Despite what the movie might say.
@@alexacosta2140 maybe they can make all of the king henrys or something
This film was amazing and Timothee's performance was incredible. Pattison was also superb.
the screams of your men shall lull me to sleep~~~
The interesting thing is that they picked a French American to play King of England and an English man to play French prince.
@@redcodec i red that in his french accent lol
Pattinson's fake french accent is so bad, he sound like the french knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
@@mudwalker6401 there was also one point where he went english accent at the tent all of a sudden. He was still cool though
The stunt guy that took the horse charge made this one of the best battle scenes ever, imo
The horse charge without a Lance? Really? Give him at least a long stick or something.
@@has489 I am not educated on the combat at hand specifically but if someone told me I had to ride a horse through the front line I'd definately not want to fall off so that's the only reason I can see keeping my sword concealed and no lance
@@marcuscole3679 The primary weapon of the charging knight is the lance with good reason. The French at Agincourt used lances:
"Also it was settled among the said French that every one should shorten his lance, in order that they might be stiffer when it came to fighting at close quarters." -Jean de Wavrin
@@marcuscole3679 I am no expert either but let me tell you what I have learned. "the spear" was the primary weapon for war for most of human history in almost every culture. The Lance or any kind of polearm was the primary weapon in this period. Swords were sidearms and were not used as you imagine them to be. The modern equivalent would be to drop you rifle and use your pistol instead.
@@has489 no cant compare range with weapons with melee.
I was legit sad when the movie was over. So well done. The vibe was unique. Beautiful masterpiece
This scene was way more detailed than I thought, this was really eye opening and now I have a lot more respect for filmography and directors
"Filmography" you should learn what certain terms mean before you use them.
finished this today, amazing Original.
Watched it yesterday for the first time. Now one of my favorite medieval movies of all time. The three f words dont really belong in the movie and felt unnatural due to the rest of the movies dialogue.
One of netflix finest along with beasts of no nation. It was brilliantly shot and great acting too
I fking loved it, what a great film.
I only hope Netflix does more movies like this. I've already watched it twice thats how much I loved "The King"!!!
Definitely, atmospheric.....more of the King please.
Not bad, but there is a lot of historical inaccuracy in this movie: costumes-scenery (too dark, too colorless, too much Game of Thrones etc.), events (okay, partly because it was based on Shakespeare's work.), and the battle (too chaotic, too mass, no lances and stakes, etc.) and the siege (very minimalistic; Harfleur is a port city, not a castle; no guns, no mining, etc.) is not authentic either. If they could shoot a similar series after such an inaccurate movie, they would rather not do it... I don't want Game of Thrones, I don't want fantasy, I want some degree of reality, not this...
I was disappointed with this movie. I was expecting more.
@@kristofantal8801 Its based on Shakespeare's plays, not an accurate account of history.
same my sister and i have watched it yesterday again for the fifth time
@@kristofantal8801 this movie isn't based on actual events. It's based on a play.
They deserve an award for this movie... The movie is an amazing movie of what it means to rule
Dont think it needs awards , it was decent.
OCULUS VR PRO excellent film
Sean Kilburn highly disagree. Camerawork was great, acting was amazing, and the movie itself was relatively historically accurate with a few bits fudged to make the movie not as clunky.
The actors are straight white males. The odds are not in their favor.
@@saturnascendz Lol for real, it's not "woke" enough for today's standards unfortunately.
Timothée Chalamet my favorite young actor there’s so many young talented actors out there who are big in the industry but Timothée got nominated for an Oscar at 21 years old... that’s completely insane so much respect for him he invests so much into a character honestly can’t wait to see him grow as an actor love all his movies
By far my favourite period piece film of all time. The people who were a part of putting this film together are nothing short of legends. Good job.
At the Battle of Agincourt, it's estimated the English and Welsh archers put 1000 arrows into the air EVERY SECOND of volley fire.
damn
archers carries 60 arrows each. I'm not sure if that math adds up
@@jimmy5391 what if the archers carried more then their usual load of arrows because they were told the majority of the fighting force would not wear armor fighting an enemy wearing armor?...ill pretty ignorant of Medieval warfare/history so I'm genuinely asking. I find that battle very interesting.
@@jimmy5391 Englands main weapon at this time period were the English Longbow because it could shoot further than anything else. Archers, especially English bowmen, usually had thousands upon thousands of arrows in reserve. Now I doubt it was 1000 arrows in the air every second, but it was most definitely 1000+ arrows in the air each volley which is basically like dodging rain at that point.
@@luketheduke173 Archers made just under 80 percent of Henry's army, 7000 longbowmen. And an experienced longbowman could draw aim and fire an arrow every 5 seconds.
Timothée Chalamet performance in this film is absolutely hypnotizing. Every thing from his eyes to his body movement told a story very few actors can achieve. What a brilliant young man.
What about robert Pattinson's acting and accent?
This movie was absolutely fantastic and Timothée Chalamet's performance was excellent, which has just made me that much more excited for the upcoming Dune movie where he is taking the lead role. Its gonna be brilliant!
There’s something magical about this era of human history. I can’t put my finger on it.
We romanticise the past. Most people would spend their lives in indentured servitude working the land as peasants, if they didn't perish in infancy.
@@RomaInvicta1 but that wasn't everyone. Duh.
It's because royalty was a HUGE part of their culture. It's fascinating.
I'm amazed at the amount of honor and respect people had back then. It's unheard of these days.
Please oh please keep making these movies. Outlaw King was awesome. This topped it! Not being biased or anything from being English 👀 well done Netlfix! Kicked HBO’s butt!
The art of creating and filming movie scenes have gained more of my appreciation. These guys are geniuses at what they do. Bravo👏🏽
Make a medieval series
We all waiting
Last Kingdom?
@@44r0n-9 the Last Kingdom is way way earlier, during the Viking age, this film takes place in the 1400s about, 500 years or so after the Last Kingdom takes place. Although the Last Kingdom is an amazing watch, what he is asking for is a series that takes place much much later on. Something with realistic battles too much like this. The real issue is as shown in this video, battles take a long time to film, especially the more realistic, grounded ones like this.
@@44r0n-9 that show is about Vikings and it isn't really about Knights and medieval intrigue in Western and central Europe.
@@Praetore_ Well to quote him: "Make a medieval series". Last Kindom also takes place in the Middle Ages. He didn't say anything about knights.
But I guess that's what he meant so you're right too.
@@44r0n-9 Again, Last Kingdom is the viking age, only about 200/150 years after Charlemagne's time, it is incredibly, incredibly early middle ages. And yes you are correct. He says medieval series, thinking Plate Armour, Knights, etc. By that point sadly there were no vikings left lol, pretty much all of Europe was christian and the real enemy were the Turks and Islam to the east. It could be interesting if somebody did ever maybe make a series based in say, 1300 - 1400 ish. Plenty of material to work with.
I got a real Battle of the Bastards vibe seeing that top camera angle. Loved this entire battle scene!
One of the best battle scenes ever. I'm glad it wasn't all slow motion lol!
Almost speechless, except to state, “incredibly heart-racing scenes.” ♥️ the story and how it was filmed, incredible movie! Make more.
Please make more of these videos where the makers analyse and go into the process of creating a scene/sequence/story. I love these and they are such an amazing way to learn more intricate details about storytelling from the creators themselves!
The shot where Joel is being trampled in the mass of soldiers is amazing!
God, this movie was so frickin' good. Kudos to Netflix for all the post promotion of it.
Watching it right now for probably the 20th time.
Very raw and well done battle scenes. Part of the history of history battle cinema scenes.
This movie was filmed perfectly!
It was such a beautiful and stunning masterpiece
Tremendous job putting this battle on screen with such reality, we thank you all!
I'm writing my scientific work about this movie and I've watched it a thousand times, same with this and other interviews, and I can't believe how amazing this film is. It's a masterpiece!
This is my favourite Netflix original movie, my favourite movie of 2019 in general. Great work!
A-MAY- ZING movie.
This was a good movie. It was beautifully done. I want more !!!
Thank you Netflix for showing this phenomenal movie! More quality like this
please!
Hey is this available on DVD???? Got Dune with Thimathee &!Beautiful Boy damnnnnn what a great actor!! Here for life even thou I’m 73 like fur real!.........🔥🇺🇸
I love that the movie is so authentic with everything like the costumes and the fight scenes. They don't use incredible stunts etc. But show how hard it was to move in thosr heavy armors
+I love that the movie is so authentic with everything like the costumes and the fight scenes." So authentic...no. The costumes and the scenery are very untrustworthy and in most cases historical inaccurate.
Too dark, too colorless, too simple. The reality was different.
"But show how hard it was to move in thosr heavy armors" It's not that heavy that you think. The armors is surprisingly flexible.
There are many stereotypes about the Middle Ages...
they took creative liberty for the battle of agincourt and did well for what they did - they portrayed plate armour well, by showing how plated soldiers can give erratic and rapid movements (i remember distinctly a scene where a soldier is repeatedly smashing a dude in the head with a horsepick) and also showing how the plate mixed with the muddy field played into france’s defeat.
What a gem! I didn't notice, but my wife told me that I stopped breathing on a few occasions throughout the film. Superb acting, writing, dialogs, everything...
That shot is the same as Jon's in the Battle of the Bastards.
lol that's exactly what I thought while watching it.
Veronica Rossi I wouldn’t say exactly the same but the shot where the camera was above the battle I would say was the same.
Yes... Unfortunately
. Sad because reality is not a Battle of the Bastards. The real Battle of Agincourt was different than this scene in the movie.
I just really love them calling Timothee Timmy it's so cute
Gabbi Rodriguez Aussie’s seem to shorten everything, at any given chance
There is a lot more of King Henry V story to tell like surviving an arrow through the skull & surviving. A sequel for sure.
That arrow to the head happened when he was only 16.
This is my favorite movie by far. I've watched it 3 times now. I have no idea what it is but it is just such a good movie. Probably doesn't help that I love Shakespeare's Henry the V. Still mad about them not doing the st. Crispin's day speech. But by god. I love this goddamn movie.
They did a good job! I hope they can make it into seasons/episodes. The movie felt so short to me.
Please keep doing these deeper dives in to the historical movies you create!
One of my favorite movies on Netflix right now. Great work.
Honestly this was one of the better Netflix movies. If we get more of this quality I'm fine with it.
I looooooooooove this movie. The opening shot stole my breath and didn't give it back till the last line in the credits.
It's my obsession
.
I can’t get over the movie...i am in love .One of the best movies I watched this year , probably on this decade
Michal Bentes agreed!
Same. Watched it 5 times already.
I've read about Agincourt all my life and was thrilled to hear that a movie about this grand moment of longbow technology overthrowing medieval armor technology. Instead I got another Braveheart melee madhouse that was thrilling in its intensity but really downplayed the archer contribution.
George Prince Yeah, I wanted the full effect of the archers’ arrows basically darkening the skies... and a constant shot of them just non stop sending them towards the French army. Still a good movie but definitely needed more archery recognition. Those longbows were the best.
Indeed, I was frustrated by the inaccurate generic melee as well.
At least they explained it a little in the Netflix history featurette
I hate how the melee is depicted in this movie. It's Vikings TV all over again. I'm so tired of seeing the same old hollywood trope in all medieval movies...
This is simply the best film i have ever seen (and score i have ever heard). Ive never once watched a movie repeatedly over and over until now. If this doesnt win best picture, im done with the academy.
I saw this earlier this week. It’s great!
I want a movie like this. But on the crusades or other historically accurate stuff from Netflix.
I thought The King was absolutely amazing!! Joel your English accent was great!
like some of GOT scenes, these are the kind of things that I'd like to see in cinema.
The battle of bastards from E6 ruclips.net/video/55OpPMw42V8/видео.html, to be precise. Netflix definitely was inspired by it. But GOT version is more immersing and better shoot.
BRACE!! Damn that battle was amazing
Put Timothee Chalamet's name in the video and he's not even in it
It doesnt say he's in the video ..
neoliberal capitalism, you wouldn't understand😅😉😉😵😵🤞🏼
He is A ClickBait worthy name.... So...
I dont Care💗💗
He certainly was in the video. Check the archers on the flank and he is moving among them. Also, when he yells "On Me". These were all obvious, don't know how you missed them.
this movie was great. thanks, guys!
The battle scene was just breathless.......I don’t think I took breath while watching it.......just absolutely stunning 👍
Loved watching the battle. Well done
One of the best and most realistic battle scene I saw. Even the early duel fight scene was fantastic.
It's ridiculous when people who do not study history see a medieval movie and think this is how battles looked like. It is far from realistic. There is nothing realistic about it when two armed mobs suicidaly run into each other and continue hacking and slashing each other in an unorderly mess.
It's a hollywood trope.
People fought in formations and battle-lines. Casualties weren't so high until one side broke and started fleeing.
ᚲᚨᚢᛚᛞᚱᛟᚾ ᛃᛟᛏᛁ dude the movie wasn’t historically accurate but the battle was completely realistic, many times in history regiments were used as bait. Formations commonly were forgotten about in the middle of a battle. Knights absolutely used their fists, knees, elbows and knives. And the battle did portrait how much of a fuckfest the real battle was. The only thing the movie didn’t do justice was to the longbow men who practically won the battle by them selves.
@@francogiobbimontesanti3826 It's not true, mate. That's only in the movies. Medieval battles and even modern engagements show one thing - when two armed mobs engaged, they are always keeping together and there is a battle-line in the front, where the battle takes place. Usually the first row or the first two ranks are fighting, while those behind are throwing projectiles, waiting to switch the ones in the front. It's dynamics of mass combat and it's real.
We even have medieval authors who describe the very same thing in their chronicles. Even in Azincourt were still two distinct sides, one packed in tight together in a single mass with only the outer edges able to use their weapons (the Monk of St-Denis says the first two ranks, Monstrelet, Waurin and Le Févre say just the first), and the other surrounding it, not packed tightly together and able to use their weapons freely.
And don't get me even started about the dumb-ass tactis involved in this movie. The cavalry completely ignores the archers in the back who are completely undefended. The French cavalries make the same mistake and engage into the same mud again.
This movie depiction of battles where soliders just chaotically and suicidally run around the battle-field with no sense of tactics and survival is just a silly movie trope, nothing else.
It was nicely shot.
One of my favorite movies of all time.
Awesome watch! Loved it. Congrats Joel
Need more movies like this and Outlaw King.
This film was so beautifully shot and is so underrated💕🥺
Watching this entire scene gave me anxiety
This is a pretty nice movie. I really appreciated the fight scenes. When I learned about WW1 an emphasis was made on the impact MUD had for ALL troops. I think this is something we as the audience dont necessarily think about, especially considering most of us probably haven't fought in trenches or medieval battles. Details like this really add to the experience, so I appreciate that being shown here. Also, that camera shot at 4:51 I really enjoyed
Honestly, even if the film did have questionable armour and had the battle not fully faithful to its real-life counterpart the battle scene and the movie were excellently executed.
The king is such a great film. 👏🏻 I applaud everyone who was a part of this production.
I was watching this scene and thinking. Of all the movies I've seen, I have never seen a battle with whole armies in full suits of armor. What a spectacle.
The scene is awesome, but how they know, who is the enemy? Like all in armor looks the same for me.
in reality they would have been wearing a coat of arms / tabbard over their armour . or via the heraldry on their shields
Actually in historical times they had the blue Fleur de Lys as a tabard for the French and the red three lions for the English.
Also battles weren't always as chaotic to the point of free for all battles. There were times that the lines held and soldiers in battle knew which direction the enemy were.
In Agincourt, the English dismounted knights had it very easy against the French dismounted knights as they had to wade through a hailstorm of longbow fire and the sheer mass of heavy infantry that surged forward became a huge traffic jam of French crushing each other to death. So much so the English archers then joined in the melee to kill off the stranded French.
In fact there could be more French killing their own Frenchmen than the English because they were literally trampling each other in heavy armor and the bodies piled high
One of the best movies I’ve ever seen
if we dont get a movie/drama series set in the renaissance era with Timothée we RIOT
at least we have this
Weird that they didn't include the wooden pikes that the archers had in front of them. What's preventing the cav from just doing one charge around the inf to slaughter the archers?
What's even weirder is that you see them preparing the pikes before the battle. They're literally piled up waiting ot be used lmao
Henry kinda forgot about the pikes
There was nearly nothing historical about this battle in this movie:
1) no pikes set up.
2) Henry V was on high ground... they shot it as if they're on low ground.
3) Archer placements were to the left and right flanks in the wooden area and on higher ground. Movie depicts archers incorrectly at the center. And reversing the king at the flanks, when the king was at the center. Completely backwards.
4) Archers fired direct, not at some goofy arch rendering their arrows with too little force to even puncture muscle let alone any type of armor.
And in this battle: once the archers ran out of arrows they took hatchets and whatever weapons they had and ran into the slopping mud to take out the French Men at arms who were weighed down in the mud slipping and falling in their armor.
5) The French prince was not at this battle, and that particular French prince depicted in the movie died a few days after the battle of dysentery.
6) The top French commander at this battle was general Boucicaut
7) Boucicaut and other noble lords of their respective divisions were taken capture, and were not murdered, only the lower lesser nobility and non-nobility were to be at first, put to death; the number of murdered prisoners isn't known, as most of the lower orders had fled, his own nobility felt it was unchivalrous to carry out the order, and King Henry V rescinded the order shortly after declaring it.
8) The attack sequence was: The French general Boucicaut lost control of his divisions; due to English taunting the first wave was fully armored knights on horse back.
Second French wave was dismounted knights advanced, but in the choke point, they just hindered the ability for the first line to maneuver.
9) King Henry V was wearing a helm with a crown circlet... his placement was a the center, not at the flanks as depicted in the movies; reports state he did fight.
10) A piece of the circlet crown was knocked off the King's helm by an enemy soldier while the King was standing over and protecting his cousin Humphrey of Lancaster, Duke of Gloucester who had been injured.
@@jmitterii2 u sure do know ur shit!.
jmitterii2 that.... i have lost my title as history buff... wow... i applaud you
I do feel like it’s not VERY important other than the fact that nobility weren’t murdered, Dauphin not being present and Henry fighting, but hhhhhh
This movie was sick loved it England well done
Joel and ‘good looking Charlie Day’ 😜 did a fabulous job with this film. Thoroughly entertaining and didn’t drag as many period pieces can.
Timothée Chalamet was awesome in this film 👏🏻
Chalamet is a brilliant actor. Still so young too
This is my new favourite film! Hail King David for his excellent work!!
great movie! more movies like this please!
i also really hope the upcoming series about the battle in the teutoburg forest has the same production quality!
Loved the movie. I hope you are gonna make more movies like this! Absolutely fantastic! :)
Nice one Netflix, more of this pls!
Superb movie, would love to see more films like this.
Best battle since the opening of Gladiator.
the battle was super lame, the famous battle of agincourt reduced to a wrestling match in the mudd, wtf
Hoddedman what are you talking about? The battle of Agincourt was pretty much a giant clusterfuck as shown. All that’s missing is the spikes the French horses ran through that protected the archers and English lines.
@@hoddedman_ARG was as close to what a medieval battle probably would of looked like that I have seen in any film !
One of the more realistic depiction medieval combat
@@leexlma that's why I loved it. Not over the top so it was very believable.
Matt Easton of scholagladiatoria has a lot to say about the accuracy of the armors used in this movie.
Really great film. Very well made. An amazing cast, also!
Congratulations Boy's fantastic job, makes me proud to be an Aussie,
same feelings for the cast & crew , I'll be revisiting the film a couple of times , I enjoyed it that much !!👏👍👌🖖
I love these behind the scenes!!
This scene was really great and an awesome one-take shot
Terrific movie! Great to see Aussie’s represented
Adi SONIGRA forget the last name and listen to the accent.
Netflix you can be great again if you make movies as good as this movie
Timothée!!!!
This should have been a series
Two impressive Australians maketh one damn impressive film!
This movie was awesome! Great acting with an accurate story.... bravo!
Sadly, no, but the story is not accurate...
No story can ever get the complete details on camera. This was at least an attempt to get accuracy of the history.
@@angiew5812 I didn't expect it, and I never expect to have FULL historical accuracy, because obviously I know it's not possible ... I didn't write this. But for a historical movie (in 2019!!!), I expect it to be pretty authentic (60-70%), not a Game of Thrones type movie. That's it ... Waiting for it ...
@@kristofantal8801 , completely your right to say so. No trolling here. Have a great day.
@@angiew5812 Ma'am, I'm a historian I'm not a troll, these are facts.
The movie is historical innacurate in many ways (costume, set, scenery, too dark, too colorless, the events are wrong, etc.). The movie is not terrible and I like Timothée Chalamet and Robert Pattinson, but that's all. Have a great day to you too!
I saw Timothee
loved the cinematography shots of the arrow volleys. I was hoping the battle of agincourt would be more realistic in terms of strategy and tactics but i understand it was a drama. such as archers not using stakes to drive off the cavalry charge and funnel them to the center where henry fought!
Frenetic is how I would describe the combat in this movie. In the modus of the Saving private Ryan Omaha beach scene. Unrelenting exhausting and personal. You find yourself drawn to the front line and there is no escaping it now. Beautifully written, phenomenally acted and masterfully directed.
Really enjoyed this movie.
This movie was great 🎥
Very interesting movie , loved it and the cast especially !!
I liked the movie, the camera shots were amazing & the plot twist was great dialogue.
Masterpiece
Netflix, you took my breath away with this movie. And then the battle happened. Big thank you Netlfix
The English longbow was 6ft tall and had an avg. draw weight of 70-80lbs some reports say up to 200 lbs. For comparison the modern Olympic bow has a draw weight of 48lbs.
These men would shoot an arrow every few seconds. They would move TONS in a couple of minutes. That's quite a workout. No wonder Strand pulling or "chest expander" was a popular workout equipment in the early 20th century.
Anyways my point is that English Archers were freakishly strong and packed muscles that would put a modern bodybuilder to shame. They cast these soldier skinny way too skinny.
Excellent job!